A nice and practical would be to further develop the setting geometry for items/folders.

A nice and practical would be to further develop the setting geometry for items/folders. It would be practical to include numeric settings for both size and rotation (angle) too. I have problem to get it excactly with existing manual settings. As a futher development would be an option to copy the size/rotation setttings (copy style).

]]>

9 Commentsto A nice and practical would be to further develop the setting geometry for items/folders.

  1. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    But…did you try to click the small white point in the middle of the arrows in the geometry menu? 


    😉

    ]]>

  2. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    No but I will try it:)

    ]]>

  3. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    TrianguloY Just what I looked for. Muchas gracias! I have just used the location feature and did not press the little dot. Perfect! Still the ability to copy these setting to next item would save a lot of work.

    ]]>

  4. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Joakim Rydström De nada. 😉


    I didn’t thought about it, but it’s true that some people can miss that feature…Maybe change the point into another one.


    Pierre Hébert: what do you think? Maybe some little round arrows? (The common ‘reload’ picture)

    ]]>

  5. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Or the word Next

    ]]>

  6. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Or more

    ]]>

  7. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    +TrianguloY Some other symbol or word could help finding all features.


    Regarding copy style ( e g copy geometry). When one have made a “perfect” item, regarding size, rotation and skew. It would be great to copy that style to the next item. Copy style includes other settings but not these. It is maybe a reason for that, but an option to copy it would be practical.

    ]]>

  8. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    I used the dot because it was the only thing that fit in the small button (because of padding), but indeed this is not explicit. I will see if I can find some icon.


    Instead of copying the shape, I would prefer to implement multi-selection. This is a bit different though, both could be combined.

    ]]>

  9. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Pierre Hébert Sounds good!

    ]]>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *