Not sure if this was addressed or not but ever since the implementation of seamless mode the app drawer seems to not…
To repruduce:
1. Choose the scroll mode (horizontal/vertical)
2.set the seamless mode for the mode selected
3a. Scroll to through all your apps to the end in either direction (1,2,3,4…. till the end)
3b. Scroll the opposite way from page 1 to the last page (1,6,5,4)
4a. If you scrolled 1,2,3 to hit the end just keep scrolling to page 1 again
4b. If you scrolled 1,3,2 then from the last page just reverse the direction to hit page 1 again.
PRESTO: the apps on page 1 disappear completely.
NOTE: It doesnt matter how far in either direction you scroll, the behavior is between the beginning/end of the list
I found this odd because this behavior only seems to affect the apps drawer, and that they reappear only when i move the page by between 2 and 10 pixels. Doesn’t seem to be a big deal but it does seem kinda odd.
]]>
< ![CDATA[
Yeah it’s a known issue. It doesn’t happen in My Drawer mode, bit happens in Alphabetical view. No ETA on fix yet.
]]>
< ![CDATA[
Efren Rivera​ Yeah i forgot to metion i had this in a-z mode. Havent checked the other modes yet because i use all my apps. I didnt know if it was addressed, now i do. 🙂
]]>
< ![CDATA[
Yes I need to fix it urgently! But probably not in the next beta as I am focusing on something else, but in the next one probably.
]]>
< ![CDATA[
Pierre Hébert​ like i said it doesnt appear to be a big deal but it seems odd. Its not something to join ISIS over hehe
]]>
< ![CDATA[
Ok here is an update: it appears that the problem could be caused by the scroll animation stopping prematurely. I slowly scrolled back and the apps disappeared as i was scrolling before the last page came into view. Scroll forward from there and the apps disappeared. Move the page slowly ahead about 6 pixels and the apps reappeared. I found that from there if i moved back about 6 pixels i can keep it on page 1 with the apps vanished. This is where i think the “issue” is. I dont know the exact pixel count but it isnt very much.
]]>