Ah, s…t, my first app removal notification.

Ah, s…t, my first app removal notification.

The update for Lightning has been rejected by Google, even though some users already received the update. Reason: “Violation of the intellectual property and impersonation or deceptive behavior provisions of the Content Policy.”

What?

Don’t know why, and don’t know when it will be resolved.

]]>

33 Commentsto Ah, s…t, my first app removal notification.

  1. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    What’s wrong with these guys?! Same thing happened to Gejos Enterprise apps. They have moved to Amazone App Store. So sad…

    ]]>

  2. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Lutz Linke had the same issue recently… Google like robots… The problem is that when a robot fail, you have no human being to discuss with.

    ]]>

  3. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Noooo! Any mentions of other apps in the description? Screenshots that contain other IP… ? Outright lies in the description, lol? Issues with trial version mechanism? Dunno

    ]]>

  4. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    No way to know what’s wrong: “submissions requesting advice will not receive an answer.”

    ]]>

  5. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    for Version 12.1.1?

    ]]>

  6. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Yes

    ]]>

  7. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Pierre Hébert well, but you don’t need advice, you want to complain!


    Maybe you violated your own rights by publishing an app with the same icon… ;D

    ]]>

  8. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    That sucks.


    I received it last night and my previous issues (wallpaper and status bar) appear to be fixed.

    ]]>

  9. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    in my opinion some of the screenshots show personally information . could be a birthday or something similar. i had this a few weeks ago. it’ should not be the text or links inside the text. after i changed the screenshots and send them a mail everything was ok.



    edit: i can’t see any personally info at the screenshots ;-(

    ]]>

  10. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    I can see it and even update it:-)

    ]]>

  11. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Yes, some users received the update before the app suspension. There are probably some automated checks that are run at periodic intervals. You have been lucky to update soon enough 🙂

    ]]>

  12. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Now for 5 minutes…

    ]]>

  13. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    No auto update, I made it manually

    ]]>

  14. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Oh no!

    ]]>

  15. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Adam Caine​

    ]]>

  16. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    i can see both LL and LLX in playstore. with anonymous login.





    remove/replace the screenshots with albumart and artists name.




    I made similar changes and after that i answered their mail


    https://plus.google.com/+gerdreuter/posts/5L7LGQFAUSv



    Hi,



    i have revised the app in play-store.


    it should now meet all prerequisites.


    if not please give me a hint what is not specifically ok



    thank you in advance

    ]]>

  17. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    I’m rapidly losing any respect for el google…

    ]]>

  18. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    gerd reuter I believe you may see one or both of the app with their previous version, either 12.0.1 or 10.0.3

    ]]>

  19. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    right now, i download this net_pierrox_lightning_launcher-2227.apk by raccoon program and net_pierrox_lightning_launcher_extreme-2227.apk

    ]]>

  20. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    but, in google play store, if i click to install buton, i see error message, with this code: 923, and download not start.

    ]]>

  21. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Now i try again (before many time try, without succes), and this time i dowlnoad LL home by google store. (v12.1.1)

    ]]>

  22. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    You probably received the update before, if you try with another account you will probably have a different result.

    ]]>

  23. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Only get 3 strikes IIRC, I get that they wanna sound professional but it wouldn’t kill them to say exactly why it was removed. I reckon they have hotkeys setup with different excuses and some dude just sits there and hits one at random on any app Google wish they developed.

    ]]>

  24. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    I just updated manually

    ]]>

  25. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Google has gone insane! I read post just like this from developers all the time. You will get it worked out. You are an amazing problem solver Pierre Hébert​.

    ]]>

  26. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Possibly any 3rd party app icons or widgets. Also any music album cover. Hard to tell. Crazy intransparency!

    ]]>

  27. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Oh. Did you use user’s screen? Maybe they ran an image search for similarity to others’ works…

    ]]>

  28. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    I’ve also heard of dev’s just waiting, and resubmitting the exact same thing with success.

    ]]>

  29. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    I tried again with some modifications (less screenshot, a link to the public post yesterday) but no luck. The funny thing is that the app has been republished and rejected this night while I was sleeping! Funny or frightening, I don’t know, because this makes a total of third attempts. I just tried a fourth time with updated screenshots, two of them contained music artwork, crossing fingers…

    ]]>

  30. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Woohoo! It seems the app finally passed the Google’s review.

    ]]>

  31. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Pierre Hébert congratulations! So, just how many chickens did you have to sacrifice while reading the code to the API backwards to achieve this feat? (Getting past the automated rejection process seems to be more a result of voodoo black magic than anything else these days…)



    Glad to see you back on course (although I was indeed one of the lucky ones to get yesterdays update).

    ]]>

  32. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Rachel Ambler “no animal were harmed during such action” 🙂


    The main fault from Google is to send generic, automated and frightening emails to developers without pinpointing the exact issue.

    ]]>

  33. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Pierre Hébert​ haha maybe you should generic, automated and frightening, emails to Google and see how they like it!



    That could be your next app! GRNdev:



    Google


    Rejection


    Notification


    for


    Developer’s

    ]]>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *