Pierre Hébert question on bindings (created a new post since there are already 43+ posts on your V12.5 announcement):

Pierre Hébert question on bindings (created a new post since there are already 43+ posts on your V12.5 announcement):

How does the efficiency (battery wise) and latency (responsiveness) of bindings compare to the use of scripts for the same objective? I already have scripts set up for the effects I want, and am wondering if there are any benefits from converting them to bindings?

Does the answer differ for (1) type of binding, and (2) whether the script involves Tasker variables or Lightning-only variables?

]]>

2 Commentsto Pierre Hébert question on bindings (created a new post since there are already 43+ posts on your V12.5 announcement):

  1. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Performances are the same. Both ways to change items properties use the same mechanisms. This is a matter of taster / easiness. Bindings are hopefully easier to set up, but scripts remain the most flexible tool.

    ]]>

  2. Anonymous says:

    < ![CDATA[

    Thanks, that helps!

    ]]>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *